AIGM home  |  Our Community  |  About Us  | 
AIGM logo Australian Institute of Grants Management An OurCommunity.com.au enterprise


Forum    Login   Join

The Channel "goes live"

Groundbreaking collective giving initiative The Channel has reached a significant milestone as it goes live and begins to accept donations from its first round of founding members.

Launched in May, the Channel is Australia's first LGBTQIA+ giving circle. And it has set itself the target of granting $100,000 to LGBTQIA+ opportunities by the end of 2017.

Members will be able to make monthly donations of $25, $50 and $100, and will play a key role in voting on where and to whom grants will be distributed. Everyone who joins before the end of 2016 will be a Founding Member.

Georgia Mathews - the Channel's founder - said the giving circle was born out of a recognition that there's great social change work going on in the Australian queer community, but that funding was "very scarce".

"There's not a lot of data on LGBTQIA+ giving in Australia. However, in the States, for every $100 awarded by foundations only 28 cents go to LGBTQIA+ issues. That's less than any other disadvantaged group."

Channel board director and LGBTI political leader Neil Pharaoh said: "This is a great opportunity to turn contributions from our community into meaningful projects and outcomes."

To join as a member, or for more information, visit www.the-channel.org

News
Hot topics for grantmakers: Increase your impact

Want to improve your grantmaking? Then don't miss the June 2017 edition of Grants Management Intelligence.

News
Ten things grantmakers must do now

The new Grants in Australia survey reveals plenty of things you can do right now to improve your grants process.

News
How the Army is turning grants defeat into victory

IN every survey we've ever done, grantseekers have said the most annoying thing about applications is a lack of, or poor, feedback from grantmakers.

News
Why you should fund core costs

At the Grantmaking in Australia 2017 conference, a hot-spot talk about core funding highlighted the lack of agreement about standards, or even what should be included in core costs.